الدفاعات النفسية بين السواء و اللاسواء لدى الطالب علم النفس العيادي

Résumé: The current study explored the psychological defenses between whether and not whether among students of clinical psychology (a field study at the University of Biskra). To know the nature of the personality structure of a student on the clinical psyche in terms of the structure with pathological tendency or the normal tendency.To achieve this study, a sample of 30 male and female students out of the total sample (172 students) was conducted.The study relied on the analytical descriptive approach that is based on data collection It was described and interpreted. The measure of the list of defense mechanisms was applied by the researcher, Amer Humaidat Al-Dhaisat 2016. The list of defense mechanisms consisted of five hypothetical situations that were designed to measure the following mechanisms (projection, reverse transformation, falsification of reality, turning against others, and turning against oneself). The final conclusion is that the students of clinical psychology used these mechanisms in a positive way, despite the negativity of the situation, in the sense that these unconscious psychological defenses can be applied as a force in an unconscious or voluntary manner, but the psychological immunity power is directed in an emotional way, so that it represents an intellectual psychological immunity. According to what appeared in the following results, it became clear that the students had used the projection mechanism by 25%, the reverse conversion mechanism by 26%, the reality falsification mechanism by 23%, the anti-self mechanism by 10.83%, and the anti-others mechanism by 14.5%. With regard to the method of employing mechanisms: the projection mechanism was employed in a positive manner with a rate of 24.5%, while for negative employment it was 0.5%. The reverse conversion mechanism was employed in a positive manner with a rate of 18.66%, while the negative utilization rate was 7.66%. The mechanism of falsifying reality was employed in a positive way, at a rate of 19.33%, while for negative hiring, it was 4%. The mechanism of turning against oneself had a positive employment rate of 3.66%, and a negative employment rate of 7.16%. Mechanism against others was employed in a positive manner with a rate of 3.66%, while for negative employment it was 10.85% .

Publié dans la revue: