الكتابة في النقد التفكيكي عند جاك دريدا من خلال مؤلفه" الكتابة والاختلاف"

Résumé: Giblets brief questions and the results of the study: And among these results and the questions that sparked my interest it has been collected in several elements, and are as follows: • Writing origins and evolution at the ancient and modern. • Altvkikin look for writing. • Derrida's position on the writing of his book "Writing and difference." And if we wanted to separate the more of these elements, we must address each element separately: First: The first element is we talked to him (the origins of writing and its development at the old and modern). The question that still need to actually answer is: Is that writing Sumerian writing the first known to man since the brunt of the land or there are still subtle effects need to excavations to reveal about her? And it is noted that many of the books, and many of the research gathered on this view in the emergence of writing, it does not have to be this consensus right? And what drew our attention to this aspect as well as the element is that the Arabs did not pay attention to the writing, the glory of our ancestors Almchaffhh for this lost heritage of our scientific and literary especially him. Secondly: With regard to the second element in our research, that of (look Altvkikin for writing), it can be said that it has reached a generally that the deconstruction of the most important contemporary criticism theories calling for the loosening of human thought immortal, which was considered sacred, and is aware of the writing element is given tends to accurate system built by dismantling most of his statements and criticism from which the march of the relative relations, and form her philosophical and development of this system reflects the position of the analysis deconstructive from ages shorthand writing, and marginalization of the signifier and the tendency of concentration on sound and mind, Fmjml cash given to science writing is Cash for bilateral Saussure (signifier and the signified) and his vision of the role of the brand and its effectiveness in the construction of the text, turning the language of the signs of the system when Saussure to the effects of the system when Derrida. An understanding of the multiple and implications from the standpoint of deconstructive criticism meanings of language by counting a form of communication and not the fact that outside the language. Third, the problems that we presented in this study are (Derrida look for writing), and may we have the following: • Derrida reject the Western idea that glorify the sound on the writing on the absence or presence, as it believed that the speech pattern broker Duale fade if the pronunciation unlike writing that keeps the functions in a series of physical signals and to do so during the absence of the speaker. • Derrida believes that writing is original, and is the earlier of speech; and that humanity itself known multiple forms of primitive writings before she spoken speeches stage. • The concept of Derrida's writing beyond the concept of language and contained and says that writing a stand-alone science. • Derrida have distinguished between two types of writing, and he saw that there was writing lean on concentration and logical writing depends on the grammatical or write post-structuralism. • I have the price of Derrida the act of writing because it is the most effective way to ensure the demarcation of the creaturely human mercury's impact. Finally, what can we observe that this Aldiridah revolution is not a revolution on the bilateral (speaking and writing) but in essence revolution list to destabilize Western thought dominant and Prosecutor idealism relying on writing the post-modernist based on "sound nihilism" Then can not the entity that generated from the writing, it is access to the language difference and emanations of silence case, or to transfer as Algmami Abdullah said: "It's a silent explosion." - L’ensemble des résultats et des interrogation qui m’ont attiré l’attention sont ci- après : 1- Les foncements de l’écriture et son évolution chez les anciens et les contemporains. En effet, beaucoup de chercheurs se misent d’accord que l’écriture cunéiforme considérée comme la première écriture comme par l’humanité. De plus , ce qui nous a attiré que les arabes n’ont pas donné une importance à l’écriture car nos ancêtre ont glorifie l’oral par conséquent , notre patrimoine scientifique est disparu notablement le patrimoine littéraire. 2- La perspective des dissociateurs pour l’écriture : La dissociateur est considérée l »une des théories les plus importantes de la pensée perpétuelle de l’humanité. Les dissociateur en disant que comprendre les différents sens et leurs significations à lézarde de la critique dissociatif, c’est de considérer la langue comme une sorte de communication et aucune vérité est hors de la langue. 3- L’avis de jacques drida pour l’écriture dans son ouvrage « L’écriture et la divergence » , Drida rejette l’idée occidentale qui préfère le son que l’écriture ou l’assistance que l’absence. Il a aussi estimé que l’écriture est l’origine en prenant en considération son ancienneté par rapport au langage. L’humanité d’après lui, a connu différentes formes d’écritures primitives avant qu’elles soient des discours parlés. Puis , il a ajouté que la conception de l’écriture inchut celle de la langue. On constaté que Drida a distingue différentes sortes d’écriture. En conclusion, on peut dire que la révolution « dridienne » n’est pas basée sur la duplicité ( écriture/ langage) . Mais , C’est une révolution basée sur la convulsion du pensée occidentale dominante qui prétend l’idéalisme.

Publié dans la revue: