الجهود اللسانية الحديثة في التأسيس لِلِسانيات العربية

Résumé: This study represents an epistemological test of the Arab linguistic efforts that tried to establish modern lesson Arabic linguistic by employing Western linguistic theories, which resulted from Western linguistic research. The research came in its final form after the introduction in the entrance and two doors and a conclusion; In this context, I saw that I categorize Arabic language efforts in four major directions, a trend that interested in the manufacture of dictionaries, and represented him with Fares al-Shadiaq, Boutros Al-Bustani, Chertouni, Louis Maalouf and others. Nahed's direction of linguistic correction, represented by Sheikh Ibrahim al-Munther, Ibrahim al-Yazji, and AsaadDagher. A trend called for the facilitation of grammar, represented by Rifaa al-Tahtawi, Hussein al-Masafi, HanafiNasif and others. And a historical trend - comparative, represented by GeorgiZidan, JabrDoumat, Dumeniki and Carmelite... In this direction, all comparative studies whose release dates exceeded the time limit approved by some researchers as the end of the Renaissance were classified as the general features of these studies, which are very similar to those of renaissance linguistic writing. And it's tailed. The first part was marked by: "On the sidelines of the subject of linguistics", which included three chapters: the first is "Rooting the Western Linguistic Achievement in the Arab Linguistic Heritage", in which it addressed the concept of linguistic rooting, linguistic rooting as a civilized project, in addition to the legitimacy of the rooting approach, and the obstacles facing Arab scholars in this field, and concluded this chapter with a presentation that included the most important linguistic root attempts in our Arab culture. The first is the efforts of Arab linguists in the light of the descriptive linguistic achievement, which I opened with a preface dedicated to the descriptive study of the language in which I tried to prove - as a matter of intellectual, not rooting - that the descriptive approach is known in linguistic studies since ancient times, and touched in a third topic on the most important descriptive structural models in Western linguistic culture. The fourth topic concerned me with a statement of the legitimacy of the descriptive handling of Arab issues, and summarized the fifth research by talking about the efforts of the descriptive linguistics, led by Ibrahim Anis, Tammam Hassan, AbderrahmaneAyoub and Mohammed Al-Shawsh. Finally, some of the overall monetary observations were made of some of the findings of these scholars. In the second chapter, she addressed the efforts of Arab linguists in the light of the transformational generative achievement, starting with the observations of this trend in Arab culture, and its most important works, as well as the view of Arab obstetricians from some dualities such as dual description and interpretation, and the duality of heritage and modernity. I also touched on the language described in their writings, and then tried to engage in dialogue with those of their efforts, led by the efforts of Khalil Amaria, Mazen Al-Waer, DaoudAbdo, FassiFihri and Michel Zakaria. The third chapter was devoted to "the efforts of Arab linguistics in the light of the deliberative career achievement", so I reviewed the most important functional models and then was exposed to the emergence of the career trend in Arab culture and showed its relationship with heritage and then its contributions to the cognitive production of the functional model, and then reviewed the efforts of some of its sciences such as Al-Mutawakel and EzzedineBoushimi. Remarks have been made regarding each of them. The conclusion included the results of the search.

Publié dans la revue: