التّكرارُ عَلامَة

Résumé: مُلَخَّصٌ: يَقْصِدُ هَذَا العَمَلُ إِلَى بَحْثِ مَسْأَلَةِ التَّكْرَارِ وَمَا يَتَرَتَّبُ عَنْهَا مِنْ أَثَرٍ فِي مُسْتَوَيَاتِ النَّصِّ الأَدَبِيِّ المُخْتَلِفَةِ، مُحَاوِلاً، مَا وَجَدَ إِلَى ذَلِكَ سَبِيلاً، التَّوْفِيقَ بَيْنَ الآرَاءِ التِّي تُهَوِّنُ مِنْ أَمْرِهِ، بَلْ وَتَسْتَقْبِحُهُ، خُصُوصًا حِينَ يَصِيرُ مُسْتَثْقَلاً دَخِيلاً، وَتِلْكَ التِّي تَزْعُمُ أَنَّهُ كَثِيرًا مَا يُصْبِحُ ضَرُورَةً إِبْدَاعِيَّةً، وَإِجْرَاءً جَمَالِيًّا يَتَوَسَّمُ مَسَارِبَ الدَّلاَلَةِ فَيَتْبَعُهَا، وَيُحَفِّزُ العَلاَمَةَ وَيَسْتَثِيرُهَا لِتَصِلَ إِلَى مُنْتَهَاهَا. فأَيُّ الرَّأْيَيْنِ هُوَ أَقْرَبُ إِلَى الحَقِيقَةِ وَالسَّدَادِ؟ وَمَا الذِّي يُمْكِنُ لِلتَّكْرَارِ أَنْ يُضِيفَهُ لِلخِطَابِ. إِلَى أَيِّ مَدَى تَبْلُغُ دَلاَئِلِيَّتُهُ فَتُشْرَعُ لَهَا أَبْوَابُ التَّأْوِيلِ؟ هَلْ كَانَ تَوْظِيفُ القُدَمَاءِ لِخَاصِّيَّةِ التَّكْرَارِ، إِبْدَاعًا وَنَقْدًا، قَاصِرًا عَنْ فَهْمِ سِمَاتِهِ، وَفَكِّ شِفْرَاتِهِ؟ وَمَا الذِّي أَضَافَتْهُ القِرَاءَةُ الحَدَاثِيَّةُ لِمَفْهُومِهِ وَاشْتِغَالاَتِهِ فِي ثَنَايَا الخِطَابِ؟ ABSTRACT : This work is intented to examine the issue of repetition and its consequent impact on the different levels of the literary text, trying, as soon as he found a way, to reconcile the opinions that belittle him and even receive him, especially when he seems to be an outsider, and those that claim that it often becomes a creative necessity, an aesthetic procedure that marks the paths of significance and follows, motivates and excites the mark to reach its end. Which of the two opinions is closer to the truth and repayment? And what can repetition add to the discourse? To what extent does his evidence reach the doors of interpretation? Was the ancient use of the property of repetition, creativity and criticism, inadequate to understand its features,and decipher? What did modern readings add to the concept of repetition and its functions in the folds of discourse?

Publié dans la revue: مجلة سيميائيات